In the last Editorial, you guys said that the word "sexy" is not allowed. What if somebody tries to avoid that, by doing stuff like adding letters (i.e. smexy) or putting in spaces or other marks (i.e. s-e-x-y S E X Y). Will that be overlooked, or will the user be warned? ~rainbow_salsa
The player will still be warned. Trying to hide words that are not allowed by altering the spelling or adding/subtracting things to it (especially to get past the filters) is not allowed. If it's obvious you are trying to communicate a word or concept that isn't allowed, be prepared to be warned for it. And trust us, we're on to just about every trick in the book. ;) (Issue 310)
Excuse me, TNT. I know you blocked the "h" and "d" words, but are we still allowed to say darn, drat, dangit, etc.? Please answer. ~12372 (piggy) My cat says hi.
Yes, those (along with heck) won't merit you a warning. But please, for the love of everything, don't post certain words just because you can, or abuse them to the point that the monitors feel they need to take action. It just ruins things for everyone else and makes more rules. *pats kitty* (Issue 310)
Special Notice of TNT Flubbing +1
Sooo... there's no great way to say this so we'll start from the beginning. :P
The Support/Monitoring and Content departments had a total communication failure. While we (Content) do site stuff and write the Editorial, they (Support/Monitoring) have the thankless job of enforcing rules and dealing directly with millions of players, and it seems that somewhere along the line one head wasn't aware what the other was doing and... yeah. As such, we unknowingly gave you guys bad information on two rules we clarified here in the Editorial recently - rules we thought were correct but didn't verify. Yes, we know we stink because of it and it's really embarrassing to admit it, but we're happy to shame ourselves if needed to get the proper info out there. So, along with this rambling apology, we'd like to re-clarify some rules mentioned in a couple of Editorials. Here we go:
So, that's it. We'd also like to apologise to the Monitors for causing confusion. Despite our attempts to help them out by clearing up the rules every week, we appeared to have made things worse this round. DX Whatever the Editorial has said in the past, they're the ones that need to enforce the rules and it's their call about what is and isn't allowed. We hope this clears things up!
And yes, they've checked other rule clarifications for inaccuracies. ;) (Issue 309)
2008-09-22
2008-09-09
2008-04-30
2007-12-12
2007-12-08
2007-12-06
2007-10-19
2007-10-12
2007-09-26
2007-09-25
2007-09-21
2007-09-16
2007-09-12